Stardust by Neil Gaiman

Stardust was written by Neil Gaiman in 2005. The author is known for having written several fantasy novels and children's books, namely Coraline, which was made into a movie in 2009. This year he also wrote the manuscript for "Nightmare in Silver"; an episode of Doctor Who in which the goal was to bring back the horror of Cybermen. Knowing this about Gaiman, I was looking forward to reading the novel. However only having read Coraline at this point, and not exactly gotten impressed by it, I had my doubts. I tried to keep in mind that Coraline was written as a children's book, though, and gave the author a clean slate when opening Stardust for the first time.

The story takes place "in the sleepy English countryside at the dawn of the Victorian era." This setting is definitely different from many other fantasy books; typically fantasy novels are set in the medieval age, often in an entirely different universe. The effect of this is an introduction that makes you stay and want to learn more about the place where the story is set. The protagonist, Tristran Thorn, leaves his hometown, Wall, to catch a fallen "to gain his Heart's Desire." To do this, he will have to walk deep into the Faerie; a mysterious land full of magic and strange beings. As he continues his journey he finds out that he is not the only one who wants the star; he also finds out more about his own past.

The novel is never boring; with 200 pages in length, Gaiman is able to keep up the pace. The novel is also filled with beautiful descriptions of Faerie, making for an interesting read. Though the novel describes witches and unicorns, it has been done in a very unorthodox manner, not making me feel like I have read it all before. The novel is also full of surprises, which makes me want to continue reading when I reach the end of every chapter.


I give this beautiful novel 4/5. The narrative was perfect, and the characters were original, but the plot was far from perfect. Except for at the end, the plot will sometimes feel a bit cliché.
All in all I thoroughly enjoyed reading the book, though!

- Charlie.

To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee: Boring Novel Read at School or an Interesting Read?

Although I did not read this work in connection with school, I have heard several people (mostly North-Americans) complaining online about this novel, saying how it is a tedious job to analyze it. I ordered the book online pretty cheap; I had heard of it before, and thought I would give it a try. To what extent is To Kill a Mockingbird actually as boring and uneventful as students claim it is?

The novel was published in 1960, and is supposed to take place in 1936. The story is based on the author's own experiences when she was 10 years old. The story takes place in Alabama, USA, where we follow the main character, Scout, and her brother, Jem. Their father, Atticus, is a lawyer who has been given the task of defending a black male convicted for molesting a white woman. The novel discusses racism to a very large extent merely through this part of the story. Class is also discussed, and the school system at the time. Considering the time it was set, the author does not spend much time mentioning Hitler and Nazi Germany, and instead chooses to focus more on prejudice in the American society.

The novel is in no way difficult to understand. Because we follow the perspective of a child, the language is simple and straightforward. The only thing I found "difficult" would be to read between the lines when there are things happening that Scout does not understand. A lot of this is cleared up later in the story, however, so even that is not really a problem. Also, despite many complaints about this book being tedious and boring, I was never once bored while reading it. Perhaps it is about preference; some people like fast-paced entertainment, while others are satisfied with stories that spend more time building up the tension. All in all, I liked reading the stories Scout had to offer, and I was never bored reading the work.

On the other hand, it may be worth noting that the novel is pretty long, meaning that you probably should not read it if you do not have the patience for it. If you want action and quick pacing, this is not the place to look. The story has been written in a very realistic way, and though the climax is very rewarding and really makes you think, the rest of the novel may not be as exciting for everyone.

My rating for this book is 5/5, mainly because I was sitting here trying to find anything negative to write about it except for the fact that it may not be the most exciting book in town. I absolutely loved reading it, and I would definitely read it again sometime just to see if there was anything I missed the first time (most likely). I loved it, and I recommend it to most people who are interesting in novels about history, racism and gender discrimination.

The next review will be on Stardust by Neil Gaiman.

- Charlie.

PS. Sorry about the big gap between the reviews. I will try to write more frequently from now on.